The circuit shown in
Figure 4–13 yields a solution for Case 2. The circuit equation is
obtained by taking the Thevenin equivalent circuit looking into the
junction of R1 and R2. After the R1, R2 circuit is replaced with the
Thevenin equivalent circuit, the gain is calculated with the ideal
gain equation (Equation 4–37).
Figure 4–13.
Schematic for Case 2: VOUT = +mVIN – b
Comparing terms in
Equations 4–37 and 4–14 enables the extraction of m and b.
The specifications
for an example design are: VOUT = 1.5 V @ VIN = 0.2 V, VOUT = 4.5 V @
VIN = 0.5 V, VREF = VCC = 5 V, RL = 10 kΩ, and 5% resistor
tolerances. The simultaneous equations, (Equations 4–40 and 4–41),
are written below.
From these equations
we find that b = -0.5 and m = 10. Making the assumption that
R1||R2<<RG simplifies the calculations of the resistor values.
Let RG = 20 kΩ,
and then RF = 180 kΩ.
Select R2 = 0.82 kΩ
and R1 equals 72.98 kΩ. Since 72.98 kΩ is not a standard 5%
resistor value, R1 is selected as 75 kΩ. The difference between the
selected and calculated value of R1 has about a 3% effect on b, and
this error shows up in the transfer function as an intercept rather
than a slope error. The parallel resistance of R1 and R2 is
approximately 0.82 kΩ and this is much less than RG, which is 20
kΩ, thus the earlier assumption that RG >> R1||R2 is
justified. R2 could have been selected as a smaller value, but the
smaller values yielded poor standard 5% values for R1. The final
circuit is shown in Figure 4–14 and the measured transfer curve for
this circuit is shown in Figure 4–15.
Figure 4–14.
Case 2 Example Circuit
Figure 4–15.
Case 2 Example Circuit Measured Transfer Curve
The TLV247X was used
to build the test circuit because of its wide dynamic range. The
transfer curve plots very close to the theoretical curve; the direct
result of using a high performance op amp.
No comments:
Post a Comment